GENDER BIAS IN WORKPLACES: A SCOPING REVIEW OF THE FACTORS LEADING THE GENDER BIAS

نویسندگان

چکیده

At workplaces gender is an issue with complex dynamics that has long been studied and discussed. The underrepresentation of women at workplaces, especially in senior positions, a noteworthy problem. Identifying the underlying causes this essential to break barriers. aim study uncover factors leading main biases workplaces. For aim, Conceptual Framework Arksey & O'Malley (2005) on scoping review methodology was used. In study, papers indexed Web Science Scopus databases between 2010 2022 were examined. Eligible identified selected PRISMA guidelines. results show predominantly are exposed these can be grouped under seven headings. These motherhood/caring, work/family balance, skill/ competence, wage, sensitiveness/emotionality, culture, physical appearance/ clothing.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The effect of gender bias on medical students and career choices: a cross-sectional study

Gender equality amongst healthcareprofessionals is no doubt paramount to allowboth equal opportunity and provision of goodquality healthcare. The General Medical Councilencourages that all colleagues should be treatedfairly, but studies have previously demonstratedgender bias against female medical students(1). Whether this might have any impact on thestudents’ decision-making process and caree...

متن کامل

Gender Bias in the Workplace

Gender bias remains a serious problem in the workplace. In order to begin addressing this complex issue, we must isolate the factors that influence these inequalities. Is one such factor political ideology? If so, how does it relate to these inequalities? Research methods used in previous and relevant studies were modified in order to explore this issue. The current research used fictional samp...

متن کامل

Gender bias in scholarly peer review

Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing and it is essential that peer reviewers are appointed on the basis of their expertise alone. However, it is difficult to check for any bias in the peer-review process because the identity of peer reviewers generally remains confidential. Here, using public information about the identities of 9000 editors and 43000 reviewers from the Frontie...

متن کامل

Gender bias in the refereeing process?

publications. Yet anonymous peer review is far from transparent. Does bias lurk within the refereeing process? Investigating the outcomes of manuscript submissions suggests that the overall process is not sexist, but differences in acceptance rates across journals according to gender of the first author give grounds for caution. Manuscripts with more authors and by native English speakers are m...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Management Economics and Business

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2147-9194', '2147-9208']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1192218